Nearly all of the check-in desks at Moscow’s Vnukovo airport had been closed by mid-March final yr – however there was a protracted queue on the one working desk, the place passengers had been being checked in for Istanbul. Whereas I waited I counted the numerous pet carriers: canine, cats, even a number of birds – their homeowners had been clearly planning prolonged journeys. I handed by border management and went searching for a smoking space. I discovered a bit of sales space; it was such a slim, tight area it might have been a canine kennel. There was already a person inside smoking and there was hardly room for the 2 of us. He supplied me a lightweight and requested, ‘so the place are you fleeing from?’
He himself was fleeing from close to Donetsk, a Ukrainian travelling by way of Moscow to England the place he had a son. ‘Put the wind up you, didn’t we?’ he stated to me in Russian. ‘We’re beating you and we’ll hold going, simply you see.’
I wasn’t fleeing, however falling, or that’s the way it appeared to me. I used to be shifting in area and the bottom was all of the sudden not beneath me. My very own journey had been deliberate lengthy earlier than, and had a really particular function, however for some peculiar purpose these purposeful plans had fairly outlived all of the legal guidelines of physics.
The struggle, begun by Russia, had disadvantaged lifetime of all its connective tissue: nothing occurring outdoors Ukraine held any which means or had any weight. The centre of life had shifted and was now there, the place bombs fell on Kyiv and Kharkiv – and but we continued to make inert actions, to twitch, as if the world round us nonetheless existed. However every thing had modified. Individuals had stopped sleeping. The inexperienced lights of social networks burnt lengthy into the evening and once more within the early morning, and you can trade feedback (information threads, telegram channels, the names of cities and villages, the variety of victims) all day and all evening, as a result of nobody was occupied with the rest. Putin was solely spoken of as ‘he’, and everybody understood completely, simply as in Harry Potter Voldemort isn’t talked about by identify.

St Petersburg December 2022. Supply: Wikimedia Commons
On Fb, pals described how they awoke and for a second or two it was if nothing had occurred – after which it ‘descended’ on them; or they wrote about how they couldn’t sleep in any respect. Some individuals carried on posting as regular, writing about themselves and no matter lay throughout the small radius of their life. However with the outbreak of struggle, this life had been devalued and meant nearly nothing, and even writing about it had grow to be meaningless. One’s personal self-worth, self-respect, the a priori perception that one might specific an opinion and be heard: all these tender and pure indicators of life withered, died again, had been scattered. My nation was inflicting ache and dying in a foreign country, and solely Ukraine, rescuing its aged, its youngsters, its canine, was a spot of life, a spot the place individuals fought for all times and saved it. And it adopted due to this fact that ‘we’ had been a spot of dying, a spot exuding dying, from the place dying unfold like a contagion – and this was an unfamiliar thought.
We had, in spite of everything, grown up in a land the place the narrative that united all its inhabitants was not the constructing of communism, however the information that we had prevailed in a horrible struggle – and that stopping one other such struggle was all that mattered. Our collective ‘we’ regarded itself by the memory-lens of big struggling and the just-as-huge effort wanted for victory. This collective self was to a big diploma constructed on the reminiscence of a sacrifice which sure us all collectively. In Putin’s Russia the only level of consensus on the historic previous was that we had been victorious within the Second World Conflict. Every part else – Ivan the Horrible and Stalin, Peter the Nice and Lenin, the Revolution in 1917 and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Terror of 1937 and the reforms of the Nineties – has remained a matter of controversy. As time passes this controversy has solely grow to be extra heated, a civil struggle of the reminiscence – brother combating brother and nobody in a position to agree on something.
An absence of collective reminiscence, and even of a view of our personal historical past that’s shared by the bulk, is among the options of Russian actuality, and it has been like this for many years. Nearly the one space the place historical past feels shared, a collective lived expertise, is the victory of the Second World Conflict, in addition to the still-unhealed wound this struggle inflicted on the bodily physique of the nation, and the sense of a particular, nearly sacred significance given to each the battle and its victory. And naturally it unites us precisely due to the uncommon and treasured feeling that, on this small nook of Russian historical past at the very least, the struggling and dying of thousands and thousands was not in useless, it was not unfathomable or meaningless, nor a sacrifice to the inscrutable gods of revolution or empire. That struggling was important to save lots of us, and the remainder of the world, from determined evil.
So, for a quick second, even the executioners and victims of the current previous had been all of the sudden united and a part of the collective, on the aspect of the great, the profitable aspect. We had been attacked and we had been defending ourselves. With out us no victory would have been attainable, and that alone was sufficient to ensure lengthy years of perception in our virtuous qualities.
I’ll observe right here what has been stated many occasions earlier than: that this perception in our personal virtuousness, in our victory over evil, and our distance from this evil, has not the least foundation in historic actuality. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939, the occupation of Poland and the Baltics, the Vlasov Motion, using anti-retreat troops to shoot anybody considered retreated or deserting, the Yalta division of Europe – none of this enters the collective consciousness. Reminiscence is distinct from historical past in that it ignores information within the identify of have an effect on: the Second World Conflict, named the Nice Patriotic Conflict within the USSR, was the one instance of have an effect on that survived as a common for generations of postwar Soviet residents.
If that struggle shored up a collective identification, no matter it might need consisted of, then in fact this struggle serves the identical operate, however to a distinct and horrible finish: we aren’t defending ourselves, we’re the aggressors and we’re doing precisely what was performed to us: invading international territory, bombing communities whereas they sleep, occupying peaceable cities and villages. We now have grow to be these exact same forces of evil that we examine in our textbooks and within the tales about baby heroes, and (insufferable to confess this as a result of there’s nothing to distinguish us) the violence of those months took root in Russia and unfold out from there, and if I can’t cease it, then I’m part of it. Helplessly so, however nonetheless one a part of these accountable.
*
Supporters of Putin, and people who spent years doing every thing they might to oppose him, are actually indistinguishable in a darkness that emanates solely risk. There is no such thing as a longer any vital distinction between Russia and Russians; between the nation with its borders and bodily options, and the Russian state; between those that stay there now and people who lived there as soon as; between the Russian language and its audio system; between those who left and those who stay. As soon as these variations mattered however now every thing works in another way.
In any case this isn’t about how the world treats Russians, however about what we ourselves are afraid of, and why we’re within the grip of such concern. None of us, neither the ‘we’ who oppose Putin, nor those that assist him, need to appear to be ‘the baddies’, and the information that that is inevitable is insufferable for each teams. The logic of struggle erases all element and calls for that we generalise; citizenship, language, nationality grow to be a cement that glues mutually unique parts right into a society, the contours of that are outlined from the surface. Private selection and biography, the nuances of political positioning, imply nearly nothing. They’ve grow to be merely one’s private affair. We’re frightened by ourselves, we recoil from ourselves. Even earlier than the surface world begins to hate us, we hate ourselves.
Contemplate even briefly this collective ‘we’ and it’s instantly clear that it has no limits. If we attempt to outline the bounds utilizing the same old instruments of citizenship or language or place of residence, it’s apparent that they don’t have any foreign money within the face of this disaster. Over the previous couple of months I’ve spoken with those that have left Russia (to distance themselves from the nation that would do such a factor) and with those that determined to remain (to withstand the regime from inside, nonetheless harmful that could be, to remain in a single’s beloved nation and to not relinquish it to those that are destroying it), I’ve spoken to those that left Russia twenty, thirty, forty years in the past, and to those that had been born in emigration – and so they all kind a part of this constellation, whilst they often desperately attempt to insist on their separateness.
Those that say, ‘I’m additionally responsible’, and people who keep it has nothing to do with them, are equally related with the existence of the brand new ‘we’, and if there isn’t a clear form to it, there’s the collective information that we’re inside a brand new actuality, as but with out its personal lexicon. This new actuality asserts its presence as a violence towards an accepted system of relationships and assumptions recognised by the world. The modifications caused by struggle make a chasm between what you knew about your self, and the way you’ll perceive and describe your self from now onwards. After Bucha and Mariupol our particular person histories have been thrown collectively into a standard sack, and shall be perceived in a standard gentle: Russians, nonetheless they describe themselves, carriers of Russian tradition, or audio system of the Russian language, dwelling inside and outdoors Russia, all belong to the one grouping of ‘these individuals who did this factor’ – and it’s from right here that we should now seek for our place and its which means.
You would possibly say that that is solely the way it seems to the onlooker, and from inside every thing is extra difficult (as every particular consciousness makes an attempt to outline itself from contained in the disaster because it unfolds). And maybe that is so. However it’s the exterior gaze, estranged and unreceptive to the attraction of the subjective self, that now defines us, and it’s tougher and tougher to be reconciled to the truth that this gaze has grow to be one’s personal. You see your self within the mirror and also you don’t recognise your self: is that particular person actually me? And what follows: can my mom actually have beloved such a creature?
The strangest factor is that the concern of this exterior gaze, which we really feel on our skins like a model, is shared by those that assist the struggle, who name it a ‘particular operation’, a measure of self-defence, or no matter else they discover to say. I overheard a dialog on a airplane just lately, a sublime lady wearing black was complaining in Russian that her bank cards not labored, including, with suppressed hatred, ‘due to these bastards’. I questioned whether or not she meant Putin and his state machine, or the world’s group and its sanctions (and, by extension, me, as I assist these sanctions). A refusal to simply accept duty is the final refuge of the one that has been knocked clear out of the life they considered their very own and compelled to ponder their very own helplessness (like those that awoke on 24 February in Kyiv and Kharkiv? This comparability can’t be justified because it was not us being bombed, it was us dropping the bombs).
‘It wasn’t us who began this, it was Putin, we had nothing to do with it,’ say some. Others keep they don’t seem to be responsible: ‘it’s the western politicians, NATO, “Nazis”, Ukrainian statehood, capitalism…’ And the image turns into so cluttered with these others who should be held accountable it turns into tougher and tougher to seek out oneself – like in a youngsters’s ebook the place you need to spot the tiny butterfly or chicken in an enormous pile of leaves, or a sailboat in a sandpit.
An total sense of falling, falling with out finish, with out time, touches everybody I’ve spoken to over these everlasting months. ‘Falling’ is an efficient time period as it may be understood in several methods – as a descent into the abyss, or the falling away of the ethical contract which binds a society collectively, falling out of the body of civilisation, falling from the human nest. This sense unites all of us (with out essentially bringing us nearer) who imagine this struggle to be evil, and who imagine ourselves to be carrying the stigma of an indefinable reference to this evil. For the surface world this connection is now referred to as ‘being Russian’, and for individuals who are related with Russia by the use of a beginning certificates or a residency allow, or language, household custom, love, hate, a protracted reminiscence, typically only a surname from a grandparent – for them it has no identify. It simply hurts. That’s in truth the way it feels: you already know your self to be at blame, due to the ache you can’t cover, or confuse with the rest.
*
Ought to we try and resolve whether or not to name this duty or guilt, within the method of Simone Weil and Hannah Arendt, and attempt to disentangle the connection between the private and the collective? As soon as once more, resolving all this may take years. And the method can solely start when the struggle ends, and it seems as if that received’t occur quickly. So maybe now’s the time to assume, not about our varied variations, however somewhat what we should do proper now.
It feels indecent to deal with oneself on this second of confusion and disarray, so I’ll endeavour to not write at size. I used to be born in 1972, solely thirty years after the Second World Conflict. The identical thirty years separates the collapse of the USSR (‘nearly cold’ as individuals used to say) from the invasion of Ukraine. Conflict was in every single place, even within the songs my mom sang to me earlier than I went to sleep: about warships on a raid, or a shot resounding, and one other mendacity lifeless within the tall steppe grass. In my Russian-Jewish household (principally Jewish aside from my paternal grandfather who gave me my surname, Stepanov) we by no means spoke about our Russianness, there was no purpose to debate it and nothing to say.
However my mother and father properly understood their Jewishness – it was harmful and a supply of ache, but in addition a supply of affection; it was extremely essential one way or the other, though what it consisted of, and the way it separated me from others, I used to be fairly unable to know. I couldn’t really feel a way of separateness inside me, however outdoors me it appeared others noticed and knew it. Jewishness was not a attribute, however somewhat a situation of existence, and life needed to be lived in accordance with it. If I used to be ever requested what I used to be, then I answered that I used to be Jewish.
Generally I’m requested how I ought to be launched: as a Russian author, a Russian-Jewish author or a Jewish author? I used to be as soon as used to saying that it didn’t matter, do as you’ll – considering on the identical time that I didn’t really feel like a Russian author or a Jewish one, and positively not a consultant of Russian letters, with its mass publications and commerce gala’s. I appreciated to think about that I represented solely myself, and carried solely the duty for being myself. This sense lasted for thus lengthy that I had nearly forgotten precisely the place and the way the query of nationality hurts. Then it started to alter, quietly, with out me hardly noticing, till on 24 February 2022 it disappeared ceaselessly. Now there isn’t a query: when I’m requested, I say I’m a Russian author.
I usually assume how a month or a yr in the past I might have been in a tram or a metro carriage with somebody who’s now combating in Ukraine and murdering harmless individuals. We, they and I, shaped and nonetheless kind a collective ‘we’, nonetheless appalling that thought is. The collective ‘we’ of temporary encounters in public area, city sq. or transport – and the ‘we’ of a shared language, which, it appears, doesn’t cease us killing one another. This ‘we’ is product of thousands and thousands of incompatible fates and techniques, which imply nothing within the face of collective guilt, shared misfortune, a shared disaster. It’s a torment to belong right here, however maybe it’s the solely factor that makes any sense proper now.
The evil that has been performed should be repaired, the place from which that evil comes should one once more be made match for people; the language with which it speaks should change. The stigma, the burning wound of collective complicity could but be a place to begin, the start of a path from this blind ‘we’ to a society of seeing ‘I’s. And this may solely be achieved from inside.